Skip to content

Up

Let me be clear: I judges stories on how they move me.

If a story makes me laugh or cry, if it takes me to a time past or a place completely imaginary, if it makes my hands sweat or forces me to sit up and say “What just happened?”—then that’s a story I want to experience. Usually more than once.

But if one story does all of that…well, then I’m just not content getting it from Netflix, checking it out from the library, or even owning the paperback. If a story does all of that to me, I’m ready to go out, slap down fifteen bucks for the DVD or thirty for the hardcover, thereby declaring it a masterpiece.

(Attention Pixar: You’ll be getting whatever percentage you get from my purchase of Up very shortly.)

Up is, without a doubt, one of the best movies I’ve seen in a long, long time. Indeed, one of the best I’ve seen. Ever.

First: I rarely laugh out loud when watching a movie alone. It just doesn’t happen. Groundhog Day is one of the funniest movies I’ve seen, and I’ll laugh at all the right parts when watching it with another person or in a group. But when I’m alone? It doesn’t even make me crack a smile.

But with Up, I not only found myself cracking a smile, I found myself laughing. Not chuckling softly. Not sniggering. Laughing—out loud—uncontrollably.

For those who’ve seen the movie, the three moments that made my laugh hysterically were (1) “Squirrel!” which I knew from the trailer but was still, in context of the scene, a laugh-out-loud moment; (2) Alpha’s squeaky voice; and (3) the “Cone of Shame” — which really did me in.

(If you’ve seen the movie, you’ll know what I’m talking about; if not, I don’t want to ruin it for you by describing it any further.)

Second: the story is as poignant as The Wheel of Time is long.

It touched me in an unexpected way. Like most people, I have unfulfilled childhood dreams. One of them is writing—a dream that came to me when I was eleven, in the sixth grade. For the past twenty-five years I’ve been—pursuing isn’t the right word, more like limping after—this dream. Write for a little while, don’t write for a long while. Now, on the threshold of thirty-six, I feel like I wasted my life.

Yet, have I? I’m married to a great woman; we’re deeply in love and are the joy of each other’s lives. I have four wonderful children. We’re a happy family. As Up reminds us, our lives often end up being more wonderful than our childhood dreams.

Of course, it’s far too simple—and wrongheaded—to say Up is about family. It is, but then again, it isn’t. More than family, Up is about the need to reassess our lives once our lives chance. We can’t live in the past. Period. We have to press on, be willing to cross new thresholds, look for other ways to find meaning.

That’s the message of Up.

But wait a minute, you say, aren’t you still pursuing your dream of being a writer? Didn’t you learn anything from Up?

The answer is: Yes—to both questions.

I can pursue my writing dreams because my life circumstances allow me to pursue writing. But if those circumstances were to change . . . well, I’ll probably need to re-watch Up to remember it’s lesson.

Which will won’t be problem, since I’ll own the DVD of this brilliant movie.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

On Reading

From Francine Prose’s Reading Like a Writer:

Part of a reader’s job is to find out why certain writers endure. This may require some rewiring, unhooking the connection that makes you think you have to have an opinion about the book and reconnecting that wire to whatever terminal lets you see reading as something that might move or delight you. You will do yourself a disservice if you confine your reading to the rising star whose six-figure, two-book contract might seem to indicate where your own work should be heading. I’m not saying you shouldn’t read such writers, some of whom are excellent and deserving of celebrity. I’m only pointing out that they represent the dot at an end of the long, glorious, complex sentence in which literature has been written.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

After a long hiatus…

. . . I’m back.

Not like anyone missed me or anything. But just in case you haven’t heard the news . . .

I’m back!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

A Note on “Recommended Reads”

Look to your right, and you’ll see a “Recommended Reads” section on my sidebar. (Scroll down if you don’t see it. Please, be my guest.)

I decided to use the GoodReads widget in a slightly different way.

Instead of announcing to the world what I’m reading right this very moment, I decided to use it to recommended those books I especially liked, really liked, or thought were amazing (GoodRead’s classifications, not mine).

Now: I’m not a critic. I don’t judge stories based on artistic merit. (Well, I don’t recommend stories based on artistic merit.) There are brilliantly-written stories that I’d never recommend (A Widow for One Year, for example), and there are stories I’ll insist that everybody read, even though they’re flawed on some level (Harry Potter).

So: how do I judge a story? In two ways.

First and foremost: as a reader. Like all readers, I want an experience. If a story gives me a great time — if it makes me feel a range of emotions, if it gives me wonder and pleasure — I’ll love that story until the end of my days, despite its flaws. Hence: The Dragons of Autumn Twilight is on my recommended list, as is War and Peace. Yes, one is a D&D novel and the other is frickin’ Tolstoy. But both gave me deep, emotional experiences — which is what I want most when I read.

Second: as a writer. (Yes, I’m one of those annoying bloggers who is also an unpublished writer.) Reading as a writer means I read on both the macro-level (character, plot, setting, structure) and on the micro-level (words, sentences, style).

However: (is it me, or am I using an abundance of colons in this post?) I do not recommend books based on writing, but only how they moved me. Often, great writing means a great emotional experience, but that’s not always the case. Both A Widow for One Year and The World According to Garp are brilliantly-written novels, but only Garp makes the cut because Garp moved me whereas Widow left me flat.

So there you have it. The recommended reads list is what it is: books that worked . . . for me.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

New Trekkie

star_trek_xi_ver16_xlg

First, I should say that I’m not a Star Trek fan. I used to watch the original episode as a kid, but never got into the Next Generation, which was very popular when I was in junior high and high school. In fact, the only Star Trek movie I’ve seen — other than this one — is the first movie. Which I didn’t like.

But I loved this the 2009 reboot! It thought it was genius how the writers set up an alternate universe. This way, subsequent movies don’t have to pay any attention to the massive amount of material that came before it. In a very real sense, this movie not only rebooted an old franchise, but also started a brand new one.

I haven’t been this excited about a series since I got wrapped up into the Firefly/Serenity story. I, for one, can’t wait for the sequel.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Need to Outline

This outlining as I go isn’t working.

For one reason, I find myself filled with doubt each time I sit down to write. I’m constantly wondering if what I’m writing is going to work for the story or not, and getting started on a chapter is just grueling.

Now, I don’t mind discovery writing. But I like to have some markers in place letting me know when I getting close to straying away from one of my story goals. And I’ve also found that discovery writing works best when I have an end in mind. If I know the purpose of a scene or chapter, it’s much, much easier for me to scrap though it.

So maybe I haven’t been outlining after all. Or maybe I have, by some standards, but my outline is far more loose than I would prefer.

At any rate, I think it’s time to stop drafting and starting thinking about where this novel is going.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

I Am Not a Fantasy Writer Yet

writing-excuses-the-guys2-300x139

The guys who do the Writing Excuses podcast just released a fantastic epidose.

Howard Tayler, the creator of Schlock Mercenary, talks about how he has recently discovered that he’s writing satire. But what’s most important on this episode is when the guys start talking about how examining your writing too soon can actually do more harm than good. Rather, it’s better just to write and write, knowing that someday you’ll have to figure out what you’re doing.

This is more true than most beginning writers know. Now, I’m not sure if I can call myself a beginning writer. I’ve been writing more or less seriously for the past five years, and perhaps the biggest mistake I made as a beginner was focusing too much on what kind of fiction I wanted to write and where I wanted to get published.

This mistake is natural, I think, to someone who starts writing late in life (I was 29, which isn’t that late, but most writers start when they’re teenagers or in college). So from the beginning, writing was more than a hobby for me.  But the problem was that I didn’t give myself any time just to write; I didn’t give myself time to learn the craft of fiction or explore what kind of storyteller I was. I was too focused on other things.

The result was that I writing frustarted me to no end. I’d write for a few months, take a few months off, and this was my habit until I decided to quit once for all last spring. This past December, however, I realized I didn’t want to quit writing. I decided to make 2009 the Year I Get Serious About Writing.

One of the big changes I made was not to confine myself to any genre — in other words, to not worry about getting published. I needed to see (a) if I enjoyed writing, (b) if I could finish a darn novel, and (c) to figure out what kind of stories I liked to tell.

Now, I grew up reading primarily fantasy and horror fiction, with a dash of SF, thrillers, and literary fiction, and today my favorite genre is fantasy. I decided to write a practice fantasy novel — The Ruins of Malzirun — to see if I like writing in the genre.

So even though I’ve talked a lot the past month or so about being a fantasy novelist — I’m not a fantasy writer yet. By which I mean to say, I’m not ready to declare myself an aspiring fantasy novelist.

For now, I’m just an aspiring writer. I’ll label myself when necessary.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

May Writing Goal

If I had to give one reason for my success at writing this year, I’d say that having concrete goals that I wrote down has made difference.

I have a few ideas of why writing down my goals is so important . . . but right now I’m too tired to even attempt to think about them, much less try to write them in any coherent manner.

But I do have a May writing goal: 200 pages / 50,000 words.

Is this doable? I think it is. Consider the following.

May had 31 days; April has only 30. In April, I wrote 155 pages, which averages to about 5.2 pages a day. But I didn’t write Easter weekend. This means that if I can write every day in May, I’ll have three extra writing days; that translates into 15.6 extra pages. So without doing anything different from what I’ve been doing, I’d be able to write about 170 pages in May.

Now, 170 is 30 shy from 200. This means that if I can find the time to write one extra page a day, I’ll be able to his the 200-page mark by the end of the month.

How long does it take me to write one page? That depends really, anywhere from 10 minutes to 30. Can I squeeze and extra 10 to 30 minutes of writing into my day? Yes, I think I can, no problem.

My writing routine is pretty simple. I put the kids down for Quiet Time (the youngest sleeps, the others have to play quietly in their rooms by themselves), and I say that time is for writing time. But what usually happens is that I jump on the Internet, read some blogs, go to Twitter, looking up useless “facts” on Wikipedia, etc.  Amount of time wasted? Between 10 and 30 minutes. So if I can just cut out this wasted time, I should not only reach the 200-page mark no problem, but I shoud also cultivate some better habits.

And if I don’t reach that 200-page goal? Well, at least I’ll have those better habits.

Wish me luck.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Dilemma

The third and final novel of Brandon Sanderon’s incredible Mistborn trilogy — The Hero of Ages — just arrived on my doorstep thanks to my friends UPS driver. I’ve been eager to read this book since reading Books One and Two.

hero-of-agesYet, I’m about 60 pages into The Great Hunt, and though I read the first half of this book, it was almost ten years ago when I did, and I don’t remember too much of anything about it. So I’m thoroughly enjoying it, too.

So, what should I read?

I’m leaning toward The Hero of Ages simply because if I wait until I finish The Wheel of Time, I won’t get around to it until late November at the earliest. And I simply don’t want to wait until then to find out what happens to Vin and Elend. On the other hand, I don’t want to get away from The Wheel of Time for too long, and since The Hero of Ages is 725 pages, if I were to read it now would mean a two-week layoff from Jordan’s amazing epic.

I’ve never been one to read more than one novel at a time. Oh sure, I can read up to five nonfiction books at a time — and I often do. But not novels. It’s not because I get the story lines confused, or anything like that. I just have never done it. But maybe I’ll give it a shot. Dip into Jordan’s word one chapter a day, and spend the rest of my time wrapping up the Mistborn story.

Yeah, that sounds like a plan.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Finished Eye of the World

eye_of_the_worldA few nights ago, I finished Book 1 of The Wheel of Time (The Eye of the World) and now I’m on to Book 2, The Great Hunt.

As I’ve noted before, this was the third time I read The Eye of the World. That’s a lot for me; I generally don’t reread books — even books I love. I figure there are just too many novels out there to read — too many worlds out there to explore — to spend time rereading books I’ve already read. Also, there’s the fact that most of the time I’m disappointed after rereading a book. It’s just not the story I remember.

This more or less held true for The Eye of the World. Having read it twice before, I knew the plot well enough to find most of the movement throughout the novel rather boring. What I found very interesting, however, was the world Jordan built. It was far richer than I remember, and its history far more interesting as well. And since I was reading it with an eye to learn how to write fantasy — not just as a way to be entertained a few hours a night for a couple of weeks — I picked up quite a bit that I hadn’t seen before.

So despite the fact that I was bored by the plot itself, I am glad I reread it before moving on to books I haven’t read.

  • Share/Save/Bookmark